Average open rate
+34 pts vs email82%
Premium audiences
Letterly vs Mailchimp
When every touchpoint needs to feel personal, automation fatigue kills results. Letterly keeps communication premium.
Teams graduating from bulk email tools who need luxury, white-glove retention.
Understanding the limitations of Mailchimp helps teams see why human-first communication delivers better results when relationships matter most.
Automation fatigue leads to 18% lower open rates in premium segments.
Newsletters feel like marketing blasts, not genuine care.
Template builders can't reference hyper-local or personal memories without heavy editing.
100% handcrafted copy that blocks paste + AI crutches.
Private microsites with analytics, not mass emails.
City + industry playbooks baked in, so personalization is instant.
See exactly how Letterly's human-first approach compares to Mailchimp's automation-focused features. Each comparison highlights why handwritten microsites outperform bulk email tools for retention and relationships.
Paste-blocked editor forces thoughtful, original words.
Drag-and-drop template encourages copy/paste habits.
Personal microsite with motion, media and CTA tracking.
Bulk email that lands in promotional tabs.
Pre-loaded local rituals + venue references for 30+ cities.
Generic merge tags require manual research.
View every note, comment and engagement trail.
Disjointed exports and screenshots.
Real data from teams using Letterly to replace or augment Mailchimp. Share these stats in competitive deals, investor updates, and internal enablement.
Average open rate
+34 pts vs email82%
Premium audiences
Time to write
7m
Median per page
Referral intent
46%
Respondents ready to refer
Share this page in your email signature, sales enablement docs and investor updates. It links directly to local hubs, industry stories and the pitch narrative.